People
The New Party News

News from the New Party

News Highlights

The 2010 General Election
Stop playing Scrooge Darling, we need tax cuts now
Government risks civil unrest over pensions
New Party sympathises with expenses backlash MPs
Miliband's carbon solution is to export employment during recession
New Party disappointed by CO2 advert adjudication delays
This year Christmas dinner will cost you £36million, if you are quick
IPPR plans would cause higher numbers to jump from UK Titanic
Stealth tax ‘shooting galleries’ creating killer roads
New Party slams 'perverse' lessons in domestic violence
UK needs to wake up and end this economic 'Greek tragedy'
New corruption figures highlight Kelly's Westminster failure
Queen's Speech a matter of the 'government's new clothes'
Labour's nuclear 'dithering' will have UK scrabbling in the dark, New Party leader tells nuclear heartland
YouTube debut for New Party following Politics Show appearance
Stop Westminster Council's bike rider robbery before it spreads nationwide
New Party calls for BBC to end its 'discrimination' of smaller political parties
New Party praises ASA for investigating 'sickening' carbon advert
Time to unburden 10 million low earners of income tax
'Orwellian' C02 advert prompts New Party call for withdrawal
Richard Vass' letter to the national press
Red Tape has left thousands across Britain jobless
Who are the real progressives?
Memories of '76
The reactionary left
The Democratic Imperative
Socialism for shoppers
Spivocracy in action
Precisely
The abdication of leadership
Rebuilding communities
The loser tendency
The United Nations: what moral authority?
How to banish cynicism
The Chancellor's iron grip - on power
British politics: Is it dead yet?

Sunday, December 28, 2008

Israel attacks Hamas in Gaza

The extensive Israeli attacks against Hamas in Gaza have resulted in well over 200 deaths - apparently including between 100 and 200 Hamas operatives and at least several dozen civilians.

Hamas has recently unilaterally announced the end of a six-month ceasefire with Israel which Hamas has in any case generally disregarded.  The legitimate concerns for Israel's security from the terrorist Hamas organisation and the natural concern for innocent Palestinian civilians come into direct conflict in the context of Hamas' stranglehold on the Gaza territory, and its habit of basing its military installations in densely populated residential areas.

Sunny of Pickled Politics (essentially a left-wing site) presents a generally balanced view of the situation:

As much as I hate having discussions that ensue in threads such as this, its difficult to avoid mentioning the scale of the attack and the people dead in yet another “retaliation”.

And while I’m perfectly aware of Hamas’s racist nature and its constant sniping, and that Israel tries to hold back in retaliating, the net impact is still that it kills more civilians. Regardless of how it couches that impact - whether as ‘retaliation’, an ‘unfortunate accident’, or a fight for its own survival, the impact is still the same.

Even worse, there’s actually the delusion that such deadly incursions will deter Hamas, without realising its exactly the sort of polarised environment that helps them grow and become more powerful. I don’t see how lifting a blockade while simultaneously launching a huge attack is somehow being nice. It’s like giving a breather to someone you were repeatedly punching in the face… just before you set their clothes on fire. As for those defending Hamas - I don’t see what else they were expecting given the recent upsurge of rocket attacks into Israeli areas.
There is, no doubt, an intractable dilemma here for Israel.  Ultimately there is no solution to this conflict without either the removal of the terrorist Hamas organisation or its root-and-branch reform.  Those calling for negotiations between the two sides need to consider the difficulties of negotiating with a party which sees no benefit in abiding by agreements into which it has freely entered and which regards civilian casualties from its own community as a propaganda asset.