People
The New Party News

News from the New Party

Thursday, January 24, 2008

Cowboys

"Three Little Cowboy Builders", a CD-Rom version of the traditional childrens' story "The Three Little Pigs", has been rejected by the judges of the Bett Award, which is backed by Becta, the government's educational technology agency, reportedly on some rather peculiar grounds:
The CD-Rom digital version of the traditional story of the three little pigs, called Three Little Cowboy Builders, is aimed at primary school children.

But judges at this year's Bett Award said that they had "concerns about the Asian community and the use of pigs raises cultural issues".

The Three Little Cowboy Builders has already been a prize winner at the recent Education Resource Award - but its Newcastle-based publishers, Shoo-fly, were turned down by the Bett Award panel.

The feedback from the judges explaining why they had rejected the CD-Rom highlighted that they "could not recommend this product to the Muslim community".

They also warned that the story might "alienate parts of the workforce (building trade)".

The judges criticised the stereotyping in the story of the unfortunate pigs: "Is it true that all builders are cowboys, builders get their work blown down, and builders are like pigs?"

This decision - or at any rate its justification - has provoked widespread uproar and derision.  Here, for example, is Stephen Pollard's view:
Who are these judges, who don't realise that children's stories are not the same as investigative journalism? The chairman is someone called Ray Barker, Director of the British Educational Suppliers Association. Is it any wonder one in five British adults is functionally illiterate when the director of the educational suppliers' association is an idiot?
Understandably Becta (and the unfortunate Mr Barker, who may not himself be an idiot, but who appears to be surrounded by a few) is a bit put out by this, and has issued a statement in its defence:
The reason The Three Little Cowboy Builders, from Shoo Fly Publishing was not shortlisted was that it failed to reach the required standard across a number of criteria. The feedback makes clear that the issues highlighted were a small selection from a much broader range of comments which in the round make clear why the product did not win.
In other words, there were a large number of reasons why the product did not win an award, but only the monumentally stupid ones have entered the public domain.

Unfortunately, this really is not good enough.  The time has long past where institutional idiocy can be considered tolerable within the educational establishment.  Is it not obvious that the existence of one or more cowboys in the universe of builders does not imply that every builder is a cowboy?  Is it not reasonable to suppose that teachers might somehow communicate this notion to their students?

We consider that it is in the interests of the teaching profession that understanding of this concept be spread as widely as possible.  Otherwise many people might be driven erroneously to conclude that the entire educational establishment is populated by ideologically crazed dunderheads who ought to be removed from their posts at the earliest opportunity.