NHS failings leave 17,000 dead
The Taxpayers' Alliance have produced a damning report on the under-performance of the NHS which suggests that over 17,000 people died unnecessarily last year as a result of failings in the health service. In comparing NHS performance against that of the health services of comparable European countries (Germany, France, the Netherlands and Spain) based on data from the World Health Organisation, the reports' authors drew the following stark conclusions:
If the UK were to achieve the same level of “mortality amenable to healthcare” as the average of the other European countries studied, there would have been 17,157 fewer deaths in 2004, the most recent year for which data is available.
This is equivalent to over five times the total number of deaths in road accidents and over two and a half times the number of deaths related to alcohol in 2004.
Steady improvements in mortality rates, relative to European peers, have been made at almost exactly the same rate throughout the Thatcher, Major and Blair governments despite huge increases in spending from 1999 to date. There can no longer be any doubt that the Government’s extra NHS spending has completely failed to deliver results.
If NHS spending had continued to increase relative to European peers at its pre-1999 rate £34.3 billion – £1,350 per household – less would have been spent between 1999 and 2004. In 2004 alone, £9.8 billion less would have been spent, 9.7 per cent of total spending in that year. This extra money has largely been wasted.
These conclusions - and particularly the figure of 17,157 premature deaths corresponds with an estimate by James Bartholomew in his book The Welfare State We're In of 15,000 deaths per annum due to NHS failures of one kind or another. Bartholomew regarded his estimate as conservative. And yet the NHS is regarded with such awe that most people dare not consider a future without it - a circumstance which has rendered meaningful NHS reform a virtually taboo subject in political debate. It is well past time that the British public awoke to the truth that socialist health care costs lives. As Professor Karol Sikora writes in the foreword to the Taxpayers' Alliance report:
“The NHS should not be a religion, with its structure set in tablets of stone. We face a choice between a modern, consumer driven service for all or a decaying, bureaucratic system which only those with their own resources manage to escape. Politicians need to read this report carefully and determine the optimal strategy they can put to a well informed public. Those that capture the best way forward will carry the British voter with them.”
We would only add that not just politicians but the public at large should also read the report. The National Health Service is a twentieth century institution which no longer has a place in modern society. Nothing short of a revolution in our health care system will do.
|